 |
Presbyterians Divesting from Israel
PRESBYTERIANS
DIVESTING FROM ISRAEL
"The decision to divest from Israel was
passed by a resounding majority of 431 to 62."
Is the decision by this Presbyterian Church "hatemongering"? Of course not, how can the truth be hatemongering?
It took me many years of intense study before I was able to break through the brainwashing that I underwent both in the Catholic Church and in the Lutheran Church before I went to the Lutheran Seminary in Canada. It was while I was at the Lutheran Seminary that I learned that what was really behind the Reformation was that Martin Luther and other Reformation Theologians were rejecting the Jewish take-over of the Catholic Church which occurred at 400 A.D. when the Catholic Church canonized the Old Testament into Christianity. As you probably know, the battle between the Jews and Christians in America was particularly intense during the American Civil War which split the Catholic Church and it was not until Vatican Two that the Catholic Church stated that the Old Testament is "Part One" of salvation history which is a watered down way of saying that like in any 3-act play, act one is "finished" (or "dead", as Martin Luther said) but the Catholic Church still refuses to make it clear to Catholics that the Old Testament is not the word of God. In fact, according to John the Baptist teachings to the Jews, the Old Testament is from "your father the devil" (whereas Jesus said I give you the New Testament from my father in heaven). The American Civil War also split the Baptists into two "conventions". The Southern Baptists remained steadfast supporters of the Old Testament slavery laws while Abraham Lincoln and the Northern Baptists were opposed to the Old Testament Slavery laws (this is all discussed in depth and in a very scholarly way in my Bible Slave Law book entitled The Economics & Finance of Jesus Christ - see the Bible Slave Law web site below). The reason I am telling you this is because the Presbyterian Church has recently declared that they are divesting from Israel. This is a very momentous event. I hope you will study the article below and then go to my web sites for information about some of the things are that are going on behind the political scenes in the coming election.
========================================
Presbyterians divest themselves from Israel
By Nathan Guttman
WASHINGTON - The Presbyterian Church's 216th General Assembly caught American Jewish organizations off guard and by surprise. The Presbyterians have never concealed their criticism of Israeli policies in the territories, but years of dialogue between Jews and Presbyterians had created an impression of an understanding between the communities.
Hence U.S. Jewish leaders were astonished to find that the Presbyterian Church has adopted the most censorious decisions ever embraced by any Christian denomination in the United States against Israel.
The Presbyterian Church has three million American members and is one of the strongest denominations in the country. This time it did more than issue declarations condemning Israel's occupation of the territories. In a precedent setting decision, it took practical steps to halt investments in Israel, and to discourage contacts with companies that do business in Israel.
Divestment decisions regarding Israel have in the past three years been reached by academic and research bodies in the U.S., but these have mostly been small institutions with limited economic clout. Their calls for divestment have had a marginal economic impact. Now, for the first time, a significant religious entity that controls large sums of money and commands the beliefs of millions of followers has called for the imposition of economic sanctions on Israel.
"By reaching this decision we want to make sure that we are not investing in activities of the kind we are trying to prevent. We see so much violence, and we want to assure ourselves that we have nothing to do with it," said Jay Rock, coordinator for Interfaith Relations at the Presbyterian church. Rock said the new divestment policy is motivated by more than a desire to insulate and detach Presbyterians from the violent Israeli-Palestinian dispute - his church also has an affirmative desire to "make our voice heard about the direction of Israeli policy."
The Presbyterian General Assembly convenes once every two years. The recent meeting was held in Richmond, Virginia. As is customary, a human rights survey was presented at the assembly and the report accused Israel of human rights violations in the territories.
The divestment proposal was forwarded by a Presbyterian delegate from Florida. The assembly's Peacemaking Committee confirmed the proposal, and brought it to the floor of the assembly plenum for a vote. The decision to divest from Israel was passed by a resounding majority of 431 to 62.
Tracking Caterpillar
Israeli delegates were not invited to speak at the Presbyterian General Assembly. Rev. Mitri Raheb, from Bethlehem, appeared before the delegates. This Bethlehem cleric urged the Presbyterians to sever economic ties with Israel. He singled out the tractor manufacturer Caterpillar, saying its products are used to raze Palestinian houses on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Sources in the Presbyterian Church said this week that they do not know whether their church has investments in Caterpillar.
The Presbyterian decision is economically significant. Well-informed sources say the Presbyterian Church commands more than seven billion dollars worth of financial instruments and pension funds. Most of this money is invested in companies and now, in keeping with the divestment decision, Presbyterian delegates will review each company's records to ascertain whether it has ties with Israel.
According to the General Assembly decision, any company which earns more than $1 million annually as a result of investments in Israel, or which invests more than $1 million a year in Israel, will be entered on a blacklist prepared for the church's leaders - the Presbyterians are likely to divest from any company that appears on this list.
While the Presbyterian decision's likely economic impact is not negligible, the American Jewish community is more concerned about the principle inherent in the policy. "This is a new phase of aggressive behavior in the expression of their feelings toward the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," said Rabbi Gary Bretton-Granatoor, Interfaith Director for the Anti-Defamation League.
He said that while the ADL and other American Jewish organizations maintain contacts with the Presbyterian church, the denomination's leaders did not inform the American Jewish leadership about preparations for the divestment policy - nor did the Presbyterians give the organized American Jewish community a chance to respond to the developments at their General Assembly.
Along with ADL National Director Abraham Foxman, Rabbi Bretton-Granatoor sent a strongly worded letter to the leader of the Presbyterian Church in the U.S., Dr. Clifton Kirkpatrick, saying that they feel hurt by the General Assembly's divestment decision. They criticized the Presbyterians for drawing a comparison between the situation in Israel and former apartheid South Africa. The letter also attacked a call by the Presbyterians for an end to construction of the separation fence.
Despite the Presbyterian divestment decision in Richmond, many American Jewish leaders point out that there has been productive cooperation with this church, particularly in the realm of human rights. "Up to 1967 they were Israel's best friends, because they always support the underdog," says Bretton-Granatoor. "After that they started seeing Israel as a superpower."
Directed divestment
In the aftermath of the storm over the divestment decision, the Presbyterian church plans to issue a clarifying statement soon, saying that it will not boycott every company that has investments in Israel, or earns profits from business with Israel.
The intention is to provide boycott exemptions to companies or entities which deal in education, social welfare and construction in Israel. The Presbyterians want to direct the divestment policy toward "companies that might cause damage and hurt the peace process," as Jay Rock phrases it.
In parallel, an effort will be made to mend breaches with the Jewish community. Up to now, American Jewish professionals complain, Presbyterian replies to objections about the new divestment policy have been evasive and unsatisfactory.
"We need to engage and think together how these two communities, which both want to bring peace to the region, can think together about ways to do it," says Rock. He said: "It's clear that tension exists right now, but I hope that an opportunity for dialogue will emerge from this."
Yet, the thrust of statements made by Rock's counterpart, ADL Interfaith director Bretton-Granatoor, casts doubt on this hope of future dialogue. "It is accepted that reasonable people will ask questions and be critical - but they have proposed drastic measures and a blanket approach, without trying to balance or consult with the other side," Bretton-Granatoor says.
Unlike other denominations in the U.S., the Presbyterian church does not have a mass membership. Yet it is considered a highly influential church, largely because its members include people with clout in spheres such as politics and economics.
In recent years, the pro-Israel community in America has come to rely increasingly on the support of the Evangelical church, which has a mass following of some 50 million believers and whose leaders are outspoken proponents of Israel's right to occupy the territories, at least until the Second Coming. This "Christian Zionism" approach was criticized at the Presbyterian General Assembly which concluded that it has no clear theological foundation.
Will the Presbyterian decision encourage other denominations to adopt divestment policies? American Jewish leaders do not seem concerned about such a falling of dominoes. The Catholic Church, the largest Christian group in the U.S. and the world, is currently drawing closer to Israel. Various Protestant denominations in the U.S. periodically criticize Israeli policies in the territories but do not seem to have divestment decisions on their agenda.
Another decision reached by the Presbyterian General Assembly has little to do with Israel, but has incensed the American Jewish community. By a 260 to 233 vote, the assembly authorized continued funding and support for the Avodat Yisrael church in Philadelphia, which tries to convert Jews to Christianity.
Jewish activists have in the past demanded that this missionary group, which describes its purposes as "messianic," desist from its activities - they have objected that Avodat Yisrael uses duplicitous tactics - among other things, allegedly posing as a Jewish institution.
Ha'aretz - 22/07/2004
============================================
CHURCH BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL CREEPING FORWARD
MIDDLEEAST.ORG - MER - Washington - 24 September: The Christian Churches in Europe and the United States have been amazingly acquiescent for so long when it comes to the Land of Christ which we have taken to calling the once Holy Land. And as the official mainstream Churches have held back from speaking up -- many feel betraying Christ's teachings and principles in the process -- the Christian Evangelical Zionist movement has pushed forward with growing messianic support for Israel, even though Christ and the second coming is so antithetical to Jewish theology.
A few months ago the American Presbyterians officially took the first major Church steps to sanction Israel, recalling how South Africa was treated in the days of Apartheid not that long ago. Now an influential Anglican group is pushing for a combination of boycott and divestment from Israel when their senior Church leaders next meet.
The Israelis and their many powerful friends and supporters are working hard to stem this Christian movement before it can gain significant traction and following. Their campaign to intimidate university professors and students groups that have called for similar policies has had considerable but not totally success, especially in the U.S. But in view of Israel's actual policies, the recent International Court of Justice decision, and the growing feelings among many that Israel has itself become a dangerous rogue State, what many Israelis and Jews have feared for a long time is beginning to happen.
Anglican group calls for Israel sanctions
Campaigners inspired by boycott of apartheid South Africa
Chris McGreal in Jerusalem
The Guardian - Friday September 24, 2004: An influential Anglican group is to ask church leaders to impose a boycott of Israel and firms that do business there in protest at the occupation.
The call, by the Anglican Peace and Justice Network, comes amid growing concern in Israel at rising support among churches, universities and trade unions in the west for a divestment campaign modelled on the popular boycott of apartheid South Africa.
In July, the Presbyterian church in the US became the first major denomination to agree a formal boycott of Israel.
The network said it would press leaders of the 75 million Anglicans and Episcopalians worldwide to impose sanctions on Israel after an eight-day visit to the occupied territories.
The leader of the group, Jenny Te Paa, said the delegation from Anglican churches across the globe was so shocked by the plight of the Palestinians, including the construction of the concrete and steel barrier through the West Bank, that there was strong support for a boycott.
"There was no question that there has to be a very serious kind of sanction in order to get the world to see that at least one major church institution is taking very, very seriously its moral responsibility," she said.
"It happened in South Africa, and in South Africa the boycott had an effect. Everybody said it wouldn't work and it did work. So here we are taking on one of most wealthy and incredibly powerful nations, supported by the US. That's the Christian call."
The network is to recommend the boycott to the church's decision-making body, the Anglican consultative council, in Wales, in June. The group will also make the case that divestment is a "moral imperative" to a meeting of Anglican archbishops in London in February.
Ms Te Paa said the network had influence within the Anglican community and that she believed the consultative council would agree to a boycott of Israel.
In July, the general assembly of the Presbyterian church in the US, which has 3 million members, voted overwhelmingly for a boycott of Israel. Some Scandinavian churches are also pressing for a boycott of Israeli goods.
Th
EFOFJC HOME PAGE
Links Page
Presbyterians Divesting from Israel
Send E-Mail to: ifhmic@leaco.net
Copyright © 2006 . All Rights Reserved