 |
|
|
New Testament Written By Child Molesters?
Hello and welcome to this interesting study of the New Testament texts!
There are sexually perverted themes that run throughout the New Testament texts, many of them involve the sexual abuse of women and children. I have compiled examples of these and have explained the true meaning of the words and phrases in those passages. (From the actual earliest known Greek texts of the New Testament, keyed to "The Greek/English Interlinear New Testament" by George R. Berry)
MARK
Mark 2:12 is a sexual joke, "he arose, took up his bed and went (walking)..." The imagery, when one understands what "he arose" really means make the joke work because he "got an erection, took up his bed (to make use of it sexually) and went... (walking)." That he is not sad in this joke, but rather in a rather "happy" condition adds to the humor of the joke because one may envision the subject of the sentence walking, head held high, with an erection, carrying his bed (for use at any opportune moment). But as we will soon discover, the words "walk" and "walking," even if they are merely inferred, have an alternate meaning that creates a whole different meaning in various places within the New Testament. By the way, this same joke is repeated in Luke 18:15-17, and John 5:8. Because some scholars were able to see these rude sexual jokes in the New Testament, they understood that the New Testament was created by the people who were famous for making these same kind of rude sexual jokes – the Romans.
Mark 6:33, "many (knew) him." This was written when "knew," "know," and "knowing" meant that someone was having sex with them. And there certainly was a lot of "knowing" going on in the New Testament!
Mark 7:30, "and her daughter laid upon the bed..." This one of those statements that is deliberately there to tempt people into having sexual thoughts. And we have to place this into the context of that time with all of the sex fests that they had in the Roman Empire every month. Those were called ‘fetes’ and there was one each month of the year. It was a time when "every bond was loosed." When members of the same family were out in the open having sexual encounters with each other, and apparently children were allowed to watch and/or participate as there were no laws forbidding it. So you can see, once you understand how sexual the lives of Romans were how any mention of anything that had a possible sexual meaning was fodder for sexual thought. This is what is called by hypnotists as "suggestion," it is what makes hypnotism possible and what makes people act upon the urges that accompany such thoughts. Which, is just what the Church wanted as we shall see as we read on.
Mark 8:18, "having eyes, see ye not?" This has to do with the alternate meaning that the word "eyes" has. I will explain just how these Roman writers has created an entire INSIDE language that only the royals could understand, which ran parallel to what they were writing on the surface of their writings which were to be read to and by those who were "commoners." You will find the explanation for how it is that we can tell the alternate usage of these key words at the end of this listing (after the passages from The Revelation).
Mark 8:25, "he put (his) hands again upon his eyes..." Here one will have to know that "hands" is synonymous with the male sex organs. Yes, this may sound very strange when one first is told of this, but it is something that has been noted by scholars before. And about the word for "eyes," it is spelled virtually the same as the word for "anus"; and so, the two are seen by those who were writing these passages as also the same. So, the joke becomes obvious to those who know what the actual meaning of those words are. So now we read in the above passages, "having (a couple of) anuses, you cannot see?" No, because you do not see with your a**! And, "he put his male sex organs again upon this anuses." We are talking about people who owned slaves and used them sexually. So, this is obviously a joke about them using their slaves in this way for sex.
Mark 9:33-37 is about the gang rape of a child. About passing around a child for sexual purposes. You may not be able to tell this in most English translations of this passage. Again, this is what a scholar may see when reading the text as it was originally written - in Koine Greek.
Mark 10:15, "...whoever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child, in no wise shall enter into it." This passage actually reads as, "whoever shall NOT receive the kingdom of God (i.e. royal privileges) as (concerns) a little child, in no way shall enter into IT." The "IT" in the passage does not refer to the kingdom of God (royalty), but "a little child." Yes, "enter into IT, the little child," in a sexual way. And so, this is about an orgy with children.
Mark 12:11, "isn’t it marvelous in our eyes?!" This is the same as Matt. 21:42. The "it" in the sentence is a phallus as that is what goes into an "eye" (anus) in the homosexual sex act being described.
Mark 13:12, "children will rise up against parents, and (parents) will put to death them (the children)."
It does not say that these are THEIR parents. It just says "parents." Which is another way of saying that people who are parents, i.e. "older." And "children will rise up," means children with erections will put those erections up against people who are parents, and those people who are parents will put them to death. And why would they put those children to death? So that there will be no witnesses to that perversion. Perhaps this is why Arrius Piso was never caught and charged for his sexual perversions as Pliny the Younger was.
MATTHEW
James Ballantyne Hannay ("The Rise, Decline and Fall of The Roman Religion") understood the true nature of the Bible and wrote about how certain words had duel meanings. He wrote, for example, that the word "stones" in places used in the Bible was actually a euphemism for testes. As he knew, and others are learning today, the true nature of the Bible is sexual. You have already become educated to the truth about God being a created concept, but "God" was also used as a title that was inherited by successive royals. And so when you read "God" and it says something like that which is found in Matt. 3:9, "God" is being used as a title for a person who is playing "God" in that instance.
Matt. 3:9, "For I say to you that God is able from these stones (testes) to raise up children..." There is a duel meaning in this passage, but the one that we are looking at is that the person who is playing God in this passage is saying that his "stones" are able to "raise up children." In other words, he is saying that his testes can get children sexually aroused.
Matt. 5:38, "an eye for an eye..." Which really meant an "anus" for an "anus"... i.e. "you can do mine, if I can do yours." And remember that the spelling of these two words in the original Greek are very close in spelling so that a person who was fluent in Greek could get an idea of what was being said; but if not on a conscious level, then on a subconscious level.
Matt. 7:3, "in thy brother’s eye." Here we have the "eye" reference being used, but in addition to that we have the word "brother." Why is that? Because as one who knows their Roman history knows, that back in that time the word "brother" has the double or alternate meaning of "male sexual partner." So now we read the sentence as, "in your male sex partner’s anus!" Such is the construction of many, many of the New Testament passages. And continuing in Matt. 7:3, "consider not the beam... in thine own eye." Which is a dirty joke saying "Never mind that their is a huge ‘beam’... in your anus."
Matt. 7:4, "Let me pull... the mote out of thine eye..." Also, "and, behold!, a beam (is) in thine own eye!"
Mat. 7:5, "... the beam OUT OF thine own eye." And, "the mote out of thy brother’s eye!"
Matt. 9:29 "then he touched their eyes..." 9:30, "their EYES were opened..."
Matt. 10:21, "... and children will rise up against parents, and will put to death them (the children). As in Mark, this passage is the same. The older people who are parents themselves get the children to "rise up" and then they put them to death, so that there are no witnesses.
Matt. 18:1-6. In this passage a child is called "it." (18:2). And the word "heavens" means that he intends to use the child sexually, and then kill "it." But I do not think that this was unique to the royals of the time when Christianity was created. I think that this was a practice of at least certain royals going back much further, and this is because of a pattern that can be seen in the practice of "sacrificing" children and virgins to "God."
Matt. 19:13-15, "Then were brought to him (Jesus) little children, that hands he might lay on them, and might pray; but the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, suffer the little children, and not forbid them to come to me; for of such is the kingdom of the heavens. And having laid upon them... hands, he departed then."
There are several things that one will notice about this statement. For one thing, it never says that he was laying hands on them to CURE them of anything or that they were cured of anything. It DOES say that he "touched" them and the passage could read that he "laid upon them." Also, "hands" is another sexual word that refers to male sex organs. Ballantyne had written about that in the work which I had already mentioned.
And, in our research on the subject of the sexual nature of the Bible we had already discussed what prayer really was/is. It is a mock of someone giving oral sex. And so, that is also what it is used as a euphemism for in the Bible. So, given that information, what do you think that the passage above REALLY says?
The passage also gives the reader the impression that the disciples rebuked those who had brought the children. But that is not the case. In fact, the people who brought the children were probably hired to go round up some children for them and they were paid for it. Instead, reading the passage as we now know it, the "disciples," or those who were with "Jesus" (Arrius Calpurnius Piso), rebuked the children. In other words, they were harsh and mishandling them when "Jesus" spoke up and made it clear to them that those children were going to die, so that they did not need to get the children upset or slap them around - unless they wanted to.
He says in the passage as if addressing the parents of the children, "suffer" because the little children have come to him (to be used sexually and then to be killed), but do not forbid them to come to him, because that is his privilege as a royal.
And then he says in Matt. 19:17, "Why do you call me good? No one is good..." He (Arrius Piso) is mocking the fact that he has fooled so many people into believing that he, as Jesus, is "good."
Matt. 20:33, "Lord, that our eyes may be opened..."
Matt. 21:42 "Isn’t it marvelous in our EYES?!" The word "it" being the operative word in connection to the word "eyes." "It," of course, is a phallus.
LUKE
As with anything that is just learned and new to a person, this may take a few readings to fully absorb. I can’t take the time to explain in great detail each and every passage herein and so one will have to learn the key words and then read the sentences and phrases that have not been fully explained.
Luke 6:20 "And he lifted up his eyes on this disciples..." He (Arrius Piso/Jesus) let his friends have use of his male sex slaves by having them, while in a kneeling position, present their rear quarters for ready entry.
Luke 6:41 "beholdest... the mote... in thy brother’s eye..."
Luke 9:47-48, "... having taken ahold of a little child he (Jesus) set IT by him, and said unto them (who were with him), whoever shall receive (take and sexually abuse) this little child in my name (meaning by his power and authority as a royal), receives (the benefit of the power of) me (that is mine). For he who is less among you all, he shall be great." He who is "less" is less for having ejaculated. So, the true meaning of the statement is as if it was a game or a contest to see who would be the winner for having had sex the most, and therefore, having ejaculated the most. You will find that this is a re-occurring theme throughout the New Testament. The "goal" as defined by the authors is to achieve orgasm in their various sexually perverted escapades as they have documented them within the NT texts.
Luke 11:7 "cause me no trouble, the door has already been shut (for privacy), and my children are (now) with me in bad; I cannot rise up (get an erection) to give (it) to thee." In other words, he is busy having sex with his children and does not want to be bothered with an invitation for sex with someone else. So, here we have an example of incest in the New Testament.
Luke 17:34 "(and) there shall be two men in one bed..." Really, a lot of this is actually a "no-brainer" as they are so obvious. They wrote what they did, as they did for specific reasons. There is a subconscious or subliminal message in this sentence that the foremind may not pick up. In reading the sentence your attention is drawn to the word "bed." However, the mind breaks things down and reads this as well, "there shall be two men in one." Which is a homosexual threesome, an act of oral and anal sex performed upon one man by two other men. Or, simply as "two men in one bed" as two men engaging in sex with each other in a bed.
Luke 18:15-17 (is the same as Mark 2:12 and John 5:8).
Luke 24:31 "Their eyes were opened, and they knew..." As our research has revealed "eye" is synonymous with "anus." And to "know" or having "known" someone means having sex with them. So, how do we read this? "Their anus was opened (for each other), and they fornicated."
JOHN
There is actually a lot more to the Gospel of John than I can cover here. And that really isn’t the point of this listing. So, I will cover this later in more detail. The purpose, once again, of listing all of these instances that occur within the New Testament texts is to provide you with the information necessary for you to see and understand the true sexual nature of the texts and to prove that this theme is consistent throughout all of the NT material.
John 1:1 "the word." The "word" ("logos") is God, and the Christian God is the phallus. As this becomes obvious in the various statements that revolve around the phallus. Oh, another thing that we have learned is that there is usually more than one or two meanings for each of the words, phrases and sentences that they authors had composed. And in order to keep track of and understand these, one will have to build a file of cross-referenced material.
(For more information follow the links listed below)
The Roman Piso Forum
The Educational Articles Site
The Roman Piso Homepage
Ancient Genealogical Information
Reply to Criticism of New Classical Scholarship
Abelard Reuchlin Homepage
Send E-Mail to: pisotheory@hotmaili.com
Copyright © 2002 Roman Piso. All Rights Reserved