2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON Vermont Independent!

2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for U.S. SENATOR for VERMONT and 2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON for GOVERNOR of VERMONT Do you believe that marijuana should be legalized for adults age 21 and over, sold in Vermont State Liquor Stores, and taxed to help Health, Education and Social Welfare programs in Vermont? PLEASE SEND CAMPAIGN DONATION CHECKS TO: CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR UNITED STATES SENATE 2010 OR CAMPAIGN TO ELECT CRIS ERICSON FOR GOVERNOR 2010 879 CHURCH STREET CHESTER, VERMONT 05143 (802)875-4038 #1 ISSUE FOR 2010! IS VERMONT CORRUPT IN THE ELECTION PROCESS? In 2008 Deborah Markowitz allegedly used taxpayer money and the official seal of her office to join an unregistered and illegal political action committee that promoted three candidates for Governor of Vermont in 2008, while fraudulently concealing material facts that there were actually seven candidates for Governor on the official election ballot. Deborah Markowitz Coalition with VPT Cris Ericson alleges she was abused by Vermont Secretary of State Deborah Markowitz because Markowitz had no right to use taxpayer funds and the official seal of her office to discriminate against candidate Cris Ericson. Markowitz Coalition Others participating in this Coalition which discriminated against Cris Ericson include University of Vermont, Vermont Public Television, Corporation for Public Broadcasting, AARP, League of Women Voters. HOW DARE UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT EXCLUDE CANDIDATES FROM DEBATES AND FORUMS! ALL TAX PAYER FUNDING TO UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT SHOULD END IMMEDIATELY! THERE IS NO ONE WORSE THAN A WEALTHY, RICH PERSON WHO THINKS THEY ARE BETTER THAN SOMEONE WHO IS POOR OR DISABLED! DO YOU THINK GOD COUNTS HOW MUCH MONEY YOU EARNED WHEN YOU ARE KNOCKING ON HEAVEN'S DOOR? THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WILL NOT BE A FREE COUNTRY SO LONG AS DISABLED AND POOR PEOPLE ARE EXCLUDED FROM CANDIDATE DEBATES AND FORUMS! THE POOR AND DISABLED ARE TIRED OF GOVERNMENT BEING OF THE RICH AND WEALTHY AND BY THE RICH AND WEALTHY AND FOR THE RICH WEALTHY! Vermont League of Cities and Towns allegedly created an illegal and unregistered political action committee and received member dues from cities and towns in Vermont, all of which was 100% paid for by taxpayers, and an illegal use of taxpayer money because Vermont League of Cities & Towns then used those taxpayer funds to hold a 2008 Governor candidate debate at the Killington Grand Resort Hotel, in which they refused to include candidate Cris Ericson. Title 18 United States Code, Section 241 Crimes and Criminal Procedure, Part I, Chapter 13 CIVIL RIGHTS If two or more persons conspire to injure, OPPRESS, threaten, or INTIMIDATE any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned... United States Constitution Article XIV 14th Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS. POLL TAXES ARE ILLEGAL, THEREFORE, SHOULD IT NOT ALSO BE ILLEGAL TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATES WITHOUT CAMPAIGN BUDGETS OR WITH SMALL CAMPAIGN BUDGETS FROM DEBATES? Debates are equivalent to job interviews so to deny any candidate participation in any publicly funded debate or forum, paid for by taxpayer dollars, is serious discrmination! ISN'T EXCLUDING CANDIDATES WITH SMALL OR TINY CAMPAIGN BUDGETS FROM DEBATES THE SAME AS AN ILLEGAL POLL TAX? Article XVI The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. WHEN TAXES ARE COLLECTED AND USED TO HOLD CANDIDATE DEBATES, AND SOME CANDIDATES ARE EXCLUDED FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE DEBATES, THEN ISN'T IT TRUE THAT THE EXCLUDED CANDIDATES HAVE BEEN DENIED EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS? Did Deborah Markowitz, Vermont Secretary of State with the members of the Coalition she joined in 2008, exceed her authority and/or abuse her authority and/or violate state and federal laws in the 2008 campaign season and election because she used taxpayer funds and her official office and the official SEAL of her office to exclude 2008 gubernatorial candidate Cris Ericson from participating in her Coalition which promoted other candidates, while excluding Cris Ericson? Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1985 (1) If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to prevent, by force, INTIMIDATION, or threat, ANY PERSON from ACCEPTING or holding office, trust, OR PLACE OF CONFIDENCE under the United States... QUESTION? Is being a political candidate a "place of confidence" and is being excluded from a publicly funded candidate forum a form of "intimidation"? Is holding political office "employment"? 42 United States Code, Section 1981 EQUAL RIGHTS UNDER THE LAW Section 1981a. Damages in cases of intentional discrmination in employment. Section 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights. Section 1985. Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights. Section 1997h. Notice to Federal Departments. 42 U.S.C. Section 12201 Equal Opportunity for Individuals with Disabilities IS BEING POOR A DISABILITY? BEING POOR WAS THE CAUSE OF THE POLL TAX, WHICH WAS OUT-LAWED. 42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 Residence requirements for voting (a) Congressional findings, The Congress hereby finds that the imposition and application of the durational residency requirement as a precondition to voting... (5) has the effect of denying to citizens the equality of civil rights, and due process and equal protection of the laws that are guaranteed to them under the 14th amendment... THEREFORE, BECAUSE 42 U.S.C. Section 1973aa-1 determined that "EQUAL PROTECTION" DOES NOT MEAN JUST IN REGARD TO RACE, NATIONAL ORIGIN, SEX, DISABILITY OR RELIGION, "EQUAL PROTECTION" ALSO HAS BROADER DEFINITIONS! Did Vermont Secretary of State, Deborah Markowitz VIOLATE THE INTENT OF THE VERMONT STATE LAWS, INCLUDING: 17 V.S.A. SECTION 2810 17 V.S.A. SECTION 2811 17 V.S.A SECTION 2831 in conjunction with 17 V.S.A. Section 2851 (2) and 17 V.S.A. Section 2891 and 2892? THIS IS THE NUMBER ONE POLITICAL ISSUE IN VERMONT ! ! ! IT IS NOT LEGAL TO USE PUBLIC FUNDS TO HOLD POLITICAL CANDIDATE DEBATES AND TO EXCLUDE ANY CANDIDATE! THE STATE OF VERMONT IS A HOTBED OF CORRUPTION ! ! ! Ms. Cris Ericson suffered defeat in toxic tort litigation only after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from her opposing attorneys Political Action Committee, Dewey Ballantine PAC, which took money from her opposing attorneys who were employed by Dewey Ballantine, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield, as proven by Federal Election Commission public records! U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY IS ALLEGEDLY TOTALLY CORRUPT!!! Ms. Cris Ericson has 10 years of litigation experience in state and federal courts. U.S. Supreme Court Reports by Daniel A. Klein, LEXIS Publishing, 2001, Page 119, Cris Ericson, Petitioner v IDC Services, Inc., et al. 528 US, 146 L Ed 2d, 2000 US LEXIS 1560, 120 S Ct 1265. February 28, 2000. 94-4630(RMT) U.S.D.C. Los Angeles, 97 Civ 3081 (TPG) U.S.D.C./SDNY WestLaw and Federal Bankruptcy Law Reporter Ericson v In re IDC THE PUBLISHED FEDERAL COURT OPINION BY JUDGE THOMAS P. GRIESA, IN STATEMENT OF FACTS, STATES THAT CRIS ERICSON WAS INJURED WITH PETN, LEAD AZIDE AND LEAD STYPHNATE. These cases should be re-opened on the Supreme Court of the United States own motion, because after filing a complaint against state plan OSHA and bringing in federal OSHA, after Ms. Ericson's husband died, she finally received material safety data hazard sheets, which should have been provided before employee exposure, keeping in mind that neither she nor her now deceased husband ever received medical treatment, and once the evidence was in that there were in fact three toxic chemicals in the special effects used filming the motion picture "Point Break", then after that, all of her court papers were dismissed and denied. THE COURTS ARE CORRUPT! Cris Ericson was injured by celebrity actor Patrick Swayze with three federally regulated toxic, hazardous chemicals, one of which was lead azide, which is a carcinogen. Patrick Swayze is now reported in the news to be near death of cancer. Cris Ericson's husband was also exposed, and died of cancer. Cris Ericson lost in court, after U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy took campaign donations from the Political Action Committee of her opposing attorneys, Wayne Cross and Stuart Hirshfield. II. "EPA denied the requested relief because the petition did not include sufficient information to provide a basis for the Agency to conclude that an unreasonable risk may exist" THEN SEE THE CONTRADICTION A. "the health effects of lead and lead azide are well documented in the scientific literature. Lead azide is a skin and eye irritant, explosive, a carcinogen, and toxic to the lungs, kidneys, nervous system, blood and reproductive system... and even death... THE CONTRADICTION IS ALARMING AND PROOF OF ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION! U.S. SENATOR PATRICK LEAHY SHOULD BE IMPEACHED! Lead Azide; Response to (Cris Ericson) Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21 [Federal Register: April 15, 1997 (Volume 62, Number 72)] [Notices] [Page 18350-18352] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr15ap97_dat-53] ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [OPPTS-211043; FRL-5578-1] Lead Azide; Response to Citizen's Petition Under TSCA Section 21 Agency: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Action: Notice; Denial of TSCA Section 21 Petition. Summary: EPA received a petition under section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) on May 2, 1996, from a citizen requesting that the Agency promulgate a regulation under TSCA section 6 that would prohibit the manufacturing, processing, or distribution in commerce of lead azide. The petitioner claims that she suffered injuries through the use of lead azide to produce a ``special effect'' in filmmaking and that manufacture of such substance should be prohibited to prevent future human injury. EPA has evaluated the petition and upon further consideration, denied it on July 31, 1996. For Further Information Contact: Susan B. Hazen, Director, Environmental Assistance Division (7408), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M St., SW., Washington, DC 20460, Telephone: 202-260-1404, TDD: (202-554-0551), e- mail: TSCA-Hotline@epa.mail.epa.gov. ...[[Page 18351]] in commerce of a chemical substance. To issue a section 6 rule on a chemical substance, EPA must find that a reasonable basis exists to conclude that the manufacture, processing, distribution in commerce, use or disposal of a chemical substance or mixture, or that any combination of such activities, presents or will present an unreasonable risk of injury to health or the environment. TSCA section 6 requires EPA to apply the least burdensome requirement to protect adequately against the risk. This finding of unreasonable risk is a judgement by EPA that the risk of health or environmental injury from a chemical substance or mixture outweighs the burden to society for potential regulation. OH! REALLY? LEAD AZIDE IS A MAIN COMPONENT INGREDIENT OF "IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES" USED BY TERRORISTS, AND MOVING IT IN COMMERCE UNDER THE GUISE OF "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALLEGEDLY AIDS TERRORISM! AFTER FILING A COMPLAINT AGAINST STATE OSHA, AND BRINGING IN FEDERAL OSHA, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" ALSO CONTAIN PETN PLASTIC HIGH EXPLOSIVES AND LEAD STYPHNATE, ALSO INGREDIENTS OF IMPROVISED EXPLOSIVE DEVICES USED BY TERRORISTS. PATRICK SWAYZE HAD HIS HANDS ON THE "SPECIAL EFFECTS" before he threw them at Cris Ericson, assaulting and battering her and injuring her with the exothermic decomposition products; and now he has DIED of cancer. Lead Azide is a carcinogen. Will Patrick Swayze allegedly DID NOT warn and inform movie industry workers, before he died, about the truth about Lead Azide, PETN and Lead Styphnate! Did Patrick Swayze die with his deadly secret and have all of his assets & funds put in a trust controlled by his wife? Lead Azide can cause cancer in a two hour industrial exposure. Cris Ericson's husband also worked on "Point Break" and was exposed to Lead Azide and died of cancer. Will he meet Patrick Swayze at Heaven's Gate? U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy is allegedly corrupt, having taken political donations from attorneys for the movie industry in this case, Dewey Ballantine PAC, after Cris Ericson allegedly complained to the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee for Judicial violations of federal Labor Law 29 CFR 1910.1200 and failing to state in the published federal opinion that Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN are in fact federally regulated, toxic hazardous substances with reporting requirements which were not met. The movie industry allegedly still abuses workers by exposing them to Lead Azide, Lead Styphnate and PETN which are all federally regulated toxic hazardous substances, under the fraudulent guise special effects. VOTE FOR HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT! VOTE FOR CRIS ERICSON! CRIS IS SEEKING FOREIGN INVESTORS! 2010 VOTE CRIS ERICSON This page has been visited times. This page created using the webpage creation facilities of Webspawner. Copyright © 2009 THIS PAGE PAID FOR BY CRIS ERICSON 879 Church St., Chester, VT 05143. All Rights Reserved.