The Brauch foundation
(Oxford spelling, uncoded)
By
Dr. Lord Timothy Martin, Arnold J.d., L.c.m.D., Ph.D.
Baron von Brauchitsch
Managing Director, The Brauch foundation
The Brauch foundation (TBf) is in compliance with the Uniform Commercial code (UCc 1-308), the international law since 1930. TBf, as a peaceful non-advocacy organization, researches international social and political structure. Presently, our main purpose is three-fold of sovereignty, solvency, and non-fianchetto (people above profit). These issues are not complex, but have many details. Members of TBf come from all walks of life contributing a vast range of knowledge and expertise. We meet and discuss issues to gain greater knowledge, awareness and new insights on international affairs. The information we impart is based on years of research and forms the basis for the most advanced concepts in the world today.
Sovereignty is very important and presently only about 30,000 sovereigns exist in the world today. The Lawyer's Guild "Secured Party/Creditor" and "Act of State (Apostille)" are not real sovereignty (a licence instead) insofar as they are issued by government. Only an Exchangor/Grantor of a trust foundation is certified to issue sovereignty after being one of the two participants in a trust fidelity ceremony. Therefore, no government official can issue sovereignty unless they are an Exchangor/Grantor of a trust foundation. But by this identity, the government official represents the foundation and not the government. It is simple to see that the Exchangor/Grantor nullifies the government participation without citing Art. I, S. 9&10 US Const. as this document has been suspended since 1930 superseded by the UCc.
Still the UCc is a very good document and useable even in a common Law (cL) environment. However, we are not in the cL environ as of our insolvent money situation. If one will take out a dollar and read the three words across the top (banner in the old ones post-1930), they will find "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE (FRN)". Amazingly, very few people realize that the FRN is not backed by gold or silver and has not been since the 1930 Geneva Convention (officially 1945 at the first United Nations [UN] meeting at Bretton Woods, New Jersey). The reason for taking the specie backing (gold, silver, tobacco, etc., - any certifiable tangible substance other than paper declared as the medium-of-exchange specie or source) from the money simply showed two world wars within twenty years taking place as a result. Country leaders knew if they could take the gold, they would control the currency (money). Therefore, when gold became a commodity for buying and selling like any mercantile widget, the world wars stopped. We can see this as conclusive evidence inasmuch as no world war since 1945. Nearly sixty-three years have passed and no world war! Still the war factor is, in reality, Economic demolition (Ed) with a "perception of war" instead.
Ideological warfare and plunder are definite problems, but both have been overcome by Ed in the UN New World Order. TBf views the UN world government as very good if sorting the sovereignty, solvency and non-fianchetto conundrums. Once these points are resolved, the government order finally will be complete started by Henry II, Plantagenet in 1180 Ce. (Common era). Therefore, TBf proposes, regarding solvency, to create within the banks a Letter of credit (Lc) that will redeem the FRN. However, the Lc would be in blocks of, e.g., Ten Billion dollars ($10B) so that a major expense would not be incurred in reference to creating a certificate for each dollar. In other words, TBf is not proposing pulling the FRN's from circulation, but the banks are in breach of contract and need the Federal Reserve certificate (FRc - name on Lc) for compliance. One could conceivably sue a bank anon for breach of contract. A sovereign is free to do as he or she wishes according to Blackstone's Commentaries 242, "As of the grace by the Sovereign himself (agbsh [aeg besh])". Of course, TBf knows the Corpus Juris Secundum is also suspended along with USC codes and any other country constitutions or common laws. Yet Judge Blackstone's comments do explain thoroughly in agbsh the TBf absolute view of sovereign freedom to do as one wishes provided no one is physically harmed. A physically injured party must exist in order for a crime to take place. Money and mental trauma are subject to much ambiguity. Whereas an injured victim is best evidence. Still, today few win court cases with merit or best evidence unless their case is not a threat in exposing the 1930 bankruptcy. Therefore, one needs the technicality of citing the UCc in a courtroom in a polite considerate demeanor.
The two most important UCc legal cites that should be memorized and completely understood by every sovereign are firstly the old versions before 2004: UCc 1-308, “Without prejudice, I reserve my common Law privilege not engaging in an unrevealed contract andor business/commercial agreement unless willingly, knowingly, and voluntarily doing so". Secondly: UCc 1-207, "No one is liable for the limited liability (e.g. purchasing power) of a compelled benefit (e.g. FRN)". The new version of UCc 1-308 is "A party that with explicit reservation of rights (privileges) performs, promises to perform or assents to performance demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the right (privileges) reserved". UCc 1-308 means we have been in an unrevealed situation in the past seventy-five years, as of the bankruptcy not being revealed. Therefore, when one is sued or challenged by a plaintiff or complainant called, e.g., "STATE OF OREGON", "THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OREGON", or "John Doe (any name in upper case letters)" you can be sure this is an unrevealed contract. STATE OF OREGON, THE PEOPLE... and JOHN DOE are federal USA zones just like the postal zip code FULL UPPER CASE ABBREVIATIONS, i.e., OR, MO, PA, etc. In other words, FULL UPPER CASE letters are a code for the UN government backed by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR that uses ADMIRALTY MARITIME/EQUITY STATUTORY COURTS). The CFR of the UN would be equivalent to the Board of Directors (BoD) of any trust foundation whilst the former holds the international bankruptcy note through their Lower Level Banks (LLB). This information is further unrevealed information and therefore, by citing UCc 1-308, one's case should be dismissed unless transcript doctoring takes place. The original plaintiff is the CFR and they never will reveal themselves in court whilst the "STATE OF's...” represent them but never reveal such (another unrevealed situation challengeable by UCc 1-308). If transcript changes are made, one must stay on task and keep the UCc in the forefront of their writings and conversations. If you are known for UCc awareness, you will be left alone. Of course, no provocative stance should be taken as of the seventeen agencies (trillions of dollars backing them) of NATO are quite a formidable military staff of the UN (Chapter III, S. 32, Charter of the UN 1945) and they will take action. Therefore, the TBf respects this substantial foe, but rather looks to NATO as an ally and we wish to be heard as of our three tiered answer for international improvement.
Without proper sovereignty, solvency and non-fianchetto, TBf believes the world may be in peril. Each day non-certified sovereigns violate their licence usage. They do not have a proper sovereignty certificate issued by a trust Exchangor/Grantor (Queen Elizabeth grants sovereignty [titles of nobility - yes a sovereign is "Lord or Lady Sovereign"] as she is an Exchangor/Grantor in a Rothschild trust foundation passed down from her relative King Henry II, Plantagenet [12th century]). These licence violations are mounting into a heavy pall of negativity resulting indirectly in increased crime, drug usage, depression, illness, etc. Confusion is the real culprit with the people thirsting for the truth, but not getting it at large whilst becoming angry and despondent as a consequence. We believe TBf is the only group with the answer to the world dilemma.
Insolvency furthers the negativity as of no credit money in circulation. That could be achieved aforesaid simply by creating the non-redeemable bank FRc (Federal Reserve certificate). Remember and I emphasize here, that the FRc is non-redeemable in gold and silver and legalized (fiatized) just like the FRN (Federal Reserve Note), but credit. "If you can legalize debt, you can legalize credit instead". The previous statement is another TBf slogan and very important for resolving the international bankruptcy of 1930.
________________________________________
